Governing · Metric

CRA contact-centre wait in international context

In FY 2024-25 the Canada Revenue Agency received over 32 million calls. Only 10 million reached an agent, and callers who did get through waited an average of 31 minutes — almost double the prior year. Just 18% of calls met the agency's own 15-minute service standard. This page sets those figures alongside published numbers from the US IRS, UK HMRC, Australian ATO, and NZ IRD — and shows why no clean apples-to-apples ranking is possible without footnoting.

Read this first. The five agencies do not measure the same thing. The CRA and ATO measure queue time from when a caller selects "speak to an agent"; HMRC measures "adviser attempts handled" (a success rate, not a wait); the IRS publishes a "Level of Service" that excludes 39 of its 99 phone lines and that the National Taxpayer Advocate has called "materially misleading"; NZ IRD does not publish a comparable wait-time figure. Treat the chart below as directional, not as a league table.
CRA average wait, FY 2024-25
31 min
Almost double FY 2023-24. ~1.7× HMRC, ~3.4× ATO, ~7× the IRS's Filing Season figure (heavy caveats).
Within 15-min standard
18%
CRA's own target is 65% (lowered from 80% within 2 min in 2019-20). OAG: just 5% in June 2025.
Calls reaching an agent
10M / 32M
FY 2024-25. Over two-thirds of inbound attempts never reached a human agent.

How CRA compares

Three views on the same underlying problem: average wait, the share of calls within each agency's own standard, and the strength of the standard itself.

Average wait time — general/individual taxpayer line

Most recent full fiscal year reported. Wait is queue time from when the caller selects "speak to an agent" to agent pickup; IVR navigation excluded for all agencies.

🇨🇦 CRA · Canada 🇺🇸 IRS · United States 🇬🇧 HMRC · United Kingdom 🇦🇺 ATO · Australia 🇳🇿 IRD · New Zealand

CRA's 31-minute average wait is roughly 1.7× HMRC, 3.4× ATO, and ~7× the IRS's Filing Season figure. Caveats on the IRS number are large — see methodology.

Sources: Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2025); CRA Service Standards 2025-26; TIGTA (2025) and US Treasury for IRS; National Audit Office (UK) and HMRC monthly performance reports; ATO Current Year Performance; NZ Inland Revenue; OECD Tax Administration 2024.

The full data

All figures are for the general/individual taxpayer telephone line where separately reported. Fiscal years differ: CRA and HMRC end 31 March; ATO and IRD end 30 June; IRS ends 30 September. The IRS Filing Season window (Jan–Apr) is staffed materially better than the rest of the year.

Agency Country Reporting period Average wait % within standard Service standard (target) Denominator caveats

Findings

Finding 1

CRA is the laggard on every published metric

Whether ranked by average wait, by the share of calls answered within the stated standard, or by absolute service-level target, the CRA sits at or near the bottom of the four agencies that publish comparable data. The OAG found that for June 2025 only 5% of CRA calls were answered within 15 minutes — against a 65% target.

Finding 2

Targets have weakened, not strengthened

CRA's service standard was 80% of calls answered within 2 minutes until 2019-20, when it was lowered to 65% within 15 minutes. The IRS and HMRC have held their headline targets at 85%; the ATO's average-wait commitment (under 15 minutes) is similar to CRA's percentile target but has been met in every quarter of FY 2024-25.

Finding 3

The published numbers flatter every agency

The IRS Enterprise LOS excludes 39 of 99 phone lines and only counts calls that ultimately reach an assistor — NTA calls this "materially misleading." The ATO openly blocks inbound calls when capacity is exceeded; blocked calls fall out of the denominator. CRA reports two different ratios from the same underlying data (35%→70% "unique calls answered" in the 100-Day Plan vs 18% within-standard in the OAG audit). Any cross-country chart needs a denominator footnote per cell.

Finding 4

The 100-Day Plan is a different metric, not a rebuttal

CRA's December 2025 100-Day Service Improvement Plan press release reports "unique calls answered" rising from 35% to 70%+ with peaks of 92%. That is a different denominator — unique callers rather than calls within the 15-minute standard — and it has not yet been reflected in an audited full-year figure. The within-standard share that the OAG measured remains 18% for FY 2024-25.

Sources & methodology

How each agency defines "wait"
Why the chart is directional, not a league table

The IRS's 4-minute Filing Season figure is for the Accounts Management line during the Jan–Apr 2023 filing window only. The TIGTA report titled Telephone Level of Service and Average Wait Times Do Not Fully Reflect the Taxpayer Experience shows wait times on the eight headline lines range widely, with the publicly reported three being the best of the set. A full-year all-line IRS figure would be materially higher than 4 minutes.

HMRC's 18m 38s is a full-year mean across all helplines for FY 2024-25; the Self Assessment peak averaged 36 minutes. ATO's 9m 01s is a full-year mean for FY 2024-25 (ending 30 June 2025); calls blocked at the network edge do not enter the calculation.

For CRA, the OAG reported a 31-minute average wait for FY 2024-25 — almost twice the prior year — and 18% within the 15-minute standard. CRA's December 2025 100-Day Service Improvement Plan press release reports "unique calls answered" rising from 35% to 70%+ with peaks of 92%; this is a different metric on a different denominator and is not yet reflected in an audited full-year figure.

Primary sources
Page last reviewed December 2025 · Data current to FY2024–25 — the latest audited Auditor General figures