Securing the Nation · Metric

Where the money goes — equipment share

NATO's second Wales pledge asks allies to put at least 20% of defence spending into major equipment — a gauge of whether the money buys new capability or is absorbed by salaries and running costs. On the 2025 estimate Canada devotes 22.6% of its defence budget to equipment, clearing the 20% line for the first time — but that still ranks 27th of the 29 allies reporting a 2025 figure, ahead of only Portugal and Belgium, and a fraction of Poland's 54%.

Where the headline 2% measures the size of the defence budget, the equipment share measures its quality: you can hit 2% of GDP and still field an ageing, hollow force if the money goes to payroll and upkeep. NATO breaks every ally's budget into four buckets — equipment, personnel, infrastructure, and operations — on the common definition, and the 20% equipment guideline is the modernisation benchmark. The figure is lumpy by nature: a single big procurement of ships or jets can spike a country's share in one year, which is why it reads best as a trend, and why Poland — recapitalising its whole force at once — sits near 54%.

Canada · equipment share, 2025e
22.6%
Clears the 20% guideline for the first time; up from 18.3% in 2024, after a decade below the line.
Rank among reporting allies
27 of 29
Third-from-last; only Portugal (20.0%) and Belgium (14.5%) devote a smaller share to kit.
Operations & upkeep, 2025e
~40%
The largest slice of Canada's defence dollar; personnel take another 36%, leaving equipment the smallest major slice — though now rising.

Where Canada sits in the Alliance

Ranked by equipment share, with the 20% guideline marked. Canada lands near the bottom: it now meets the floor, but the modernising allies — Poland, Finland, Hungary, Lithuania — devote roughly twice as much of their budgets to new capability. Step through the years to see how lumpy procurement makes the ranking move.

Major equipment as a share of defence spending, NATO members — 2025 estimate (%)
Source: NATO, Defence Expenditure of NATO Countries (2014–2025), Table 8a (equipment incl. R&D devoted to major equipment); 2024–25 are NATO estimates. Dashed line marks the 20% guideline. 29 allies shown. Use the year buttons to step through 2014–2025; allies re-rank for the selected year.

Canada's decade below the line

Canada's equipment share sat between 10% and 18% for eleven years, never reaching the 20% guideline, before the 2025 estimate lifts it to 22.6% — the first time the country has crossed the line.

Canada — equipment as a share of defence spending, 2014–2025e (%)
Source: NATO, Defence Expenditure of NATO Countries (2014–2025), Table 8a. 2024–25 are NATO estimates. Dashed line marks the 20% guideline.

What the dollar is split into

The flip side of a low equipment share is a budget weighted toward running the force rather than re-equipping it. Operations and maintenance has been Canada's largest category throughout, and personnel its second; equipment was the smallest major slice every year until the 2025 estimate, when its rise and a falling personnel share began to rebalance the mix.

Canada — defence spending by category, 2014–2025e (% of total)
Source: NATO, Defence Expenditure of NATO Countries (2014–2025), Tables 8a (equipment, personnel) and 8b (infrastructure; operations/other). Columns sum to 100%. Personnel includes military and civilian pay and pensions; "operations/other" is operations & maintenance plus unallocated spending.

Findings

Finding 1

20% reached only in 2025

Canada's equipment share hit 22.6% in the 2025 estimate after eleven straight years below the guideline (a 10–18% range across 2014–2024). Like the 2% spending target, it is a line crossed only in the latest year.

Finding 2

Third-from-last in the Alliance

At 22.6%, Canada ranks 27th of the 29 allies with a published 2025 figure — above only Portugal and Belgium. The modernisers spend roughly double: Poland 54%, Finland 46%, Lithuania 46%, Hungary 45%.

Finding 3

The dollar still runs the force

On the 2025 mix, about 40% of Canada's defence spending goes to operations and upkeep and 36% to personnel, with just 1% on infrastructure — leaving 23% for equipment, the smallest major slice, though now climbing.

Finding 4

Lumpy — sustaining it is the test

Equipment share jumps with one-off procurements, so a single strong year is not modernisation. Holding above 20% will take steady recapitalisation, not a one-time bump — the pattern that keeps the eastern-flank allies high.

Sources & methodology

Primary sources
Methodology notes
  1. Definition. Equipment share is major-equipment expenditure plus the R&D devoted to major equipment, as a percentage of total defence spending, on NATO's common definition. The 20% guideline (Wales 2014) is the modernisation benchmark.
  2. Comparability. All members on the common NATO basis. 2024–25 are NATO estimates. Denmark and Germany have no 2025 equipment figure published and are omitted from the 2025 ranking (29 of 31 reporting). Equipment share is lumpy — a single large procurement can spike one year — so the trend matters more than any single point.
  3. Companion workbook. The full 2014–2025 series for every member, the 2025 ranking with gap-to-20%, and Canada's four-way spending mix live in Securing_Equipment-Share_Data.xlsx.
Page last reviewed June 2026 · Data current to the 2025 estimate — the latest NATO defence-expenditure report